Several of the stories we’ve run on BenefitsCanada.com over the past few weeks have triggered a lot of discussion.
When we asked if convicted felons should receive pensions, one reader pointed out:
“It is galling to see Col. William receive his pension. But, pensions are part of total compensation, and a family asset. There is no indication his wife was in any way complicit in his crimes. In a way, she too is a victim. Really it is his wife, not Col. Williams who benefits, and it’s hard to argue she should not have the support she was entitled to expect as spouse of a senior officer.”
If you missed it, read the story and leave a comment of your own.
The open letter from CUPE regarding Toronto Hydro’s lawsuit against OMERS was another story that sparked response.
“I think OMERS has it right. I tire of seeing obscene compensation packages for senior executives who are in figurehead caretaker-type positions surrounded by layers of staff who do all the work. If an executive truly shows innovative brilliance that affects the long-term viability of an organization, then and only then, should they see large bonuses. Those of us who have worked in big organizations, would probably agree from past experience that brilliance does not shine brightly, if at all, from most top executive office suites,” was what Andrew Block had to say about the article. What’s your take?
Here are some other stories that got a lot of interest. Let us know what you think about these issues.