The study finds that the problems with Credit Suisse’s volatility product were not a result of exposure to a volatility index, rather then stemmed from problems that are specific to ETFs. Specifically, the inefficient share creation process and speculative motives of uninformed, return-chasing investors. According to the study:
Under normal market conditions, short-selling can suppress the accumulation of positive premiums. However, if share creation is suspended during a significant surge in demand the security may become unavailable for borrowing, which limits short-selling activities.
The EDHEC-Risk study notes that the volatility exposure through volatility exchange-traded products is typically to a constant-maturity VIX futures index that can differ substantially from the spot VIX index. Short maturities are characterised by higher sensitivity to VIX but also higher roll-over costs.
The study also recommends that investors in volatility ETNS need to understand that the underlying index that the product is tracking does not correspond to the actual volatility index but to a systematic strategy of investing into volatility index futures, and that an ETN risks having its returns decoupled from the underlying. Product providers, on the other hand, need to ensure that sufficient education is provided to investors on the limits of such products in order for the significant growth in these products to be sustainable.