Money in Motion Roundtable
November 01, 2009 | Brooke Smith

For this year’s Top 40 Money Managers Report, we brought together money managers, consultants and plan sponsors in a virtual roundtable to discuss investment decisions that plan sponsors are making, how they translate into action and the trends we can expect in the next few years. The full discussion follows.

Participants:

Peter Arnold, national practice leader, investment and CAP consulting, Buck Consultants
Roger J. Beauchemin, president and CEO, McLean Budden
Martin Bélanger, director, investments, The University of Western Ontario
Robert Chepelsky, principal, asset consulting, Morneau Sobeco
Peter Chiappinelli, senior vice-president, asset allocation strategies, Pyramis Global Advisors, a Fidelity Investments Company
Zaheed Jiwani, senior investment consultant, Hewitt Associates
Paul Lorimer, vice-president, finance and operations, The Christian and Missionary Alliance in Canada
Len Racioppo, president and director, Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd.
Brent Smith, senior vice-president, chief investment officer, Franklin Templeton Managed Investment Solutions
Bruce Winch, senior vice-president, institutional investments, Invesco

What changes have plan sponsors been making to their investment strategies and asset allocation as a result of the market activity?

Beauchemin: From our perspective we have witnessed two themes coming from sponsors. The first is that there is significantly more sponsor interest in liability driven investment (LDI) strategies, and our sense is that adoption of some LDI solutions will change the defined benefit (DB) landscape as plan funding levels reach a certain level. The second revolves around a more profound appreciation for liquidity risk, from being unable to raise cash to sponsor frustration at their difficulty and, in some cases, inability, in rebalancing their asset mix during prolonged market events.

Smith: As an asset manager, we have not necessarily made any changes to our investment strategy but have certainly been more active within the asset allocation space to capture some of the value that has presented itself. We believe that asset managers must be willing to take a more active approach with asset allocation in the years ahead as another way to add alpha as opposed to relying strictly on their underlying investments to deliver that alpha.

If anything, the last eight years has demonstrated that a passive approach to asset allocation added, unfortunately, very little value. If returns going forward are going to be much more subdued than in decades past as many pundits expect, then a more active approach to asset allocation may be appropriate. I think asset managers will begin to explore areas that they have traditionally not allocated assets to, such as managed futures, in order to further diversify their portfolios with the goal of trying to minimize the downward volatility of their portfolios in times of market stress. Racioppo: There does not appear to have been any significant change in terms of overall equity/fixed income mix, but there has definitely been an increased desire for liquidity as well as a better understanding of the potential lack of liquidity in some of their private or hedge fund investments.

Winch: Every plan is different and in a different situation, so there hasn’t really been one common response or solution. If there were, it would be a heightened focus on risk management. To that end, some sponsors are considering LDI strategies, although the related costs may be high. Many plans have increased the duration and weighting of their fixed income sleeves, while others are focusing on ways to reduce volatility.

Related Stories

Although there is considerable discussion about different ideas or scenarios, changes take place slowly in the institutional world. And, when markets pick up as they have just recently, momentum is lost. The good thing is that there seems to be a realization that there is no perfect solution or magical pill. Plan sponsors—many of them underfunded—need to be as well diversified as possible. They need the extra potential returns of equities and alternatives and can’t afford to be mainly in fixed income.

Chepelsky: Through all of this market turmoil, we have urged clients to stick with their long-term policy asset mix and to ignore recent market movements. For pension plans, that means keeping asset mixes within the constraints detailed in their Statement of Investment Policies and Procedures (SIPP). For the most part, our pension plan clients listened to us and have benefited from the market rebound. Most pension plans did not change their asset mix, although a few chose not to rebalance back to policy targets, which caused a slight drag on performance. We have had a few clients inquire about LDI strategies in an attempt to mitigate some of their plan risk going forward.

Lorimer: The Christian and Missionary Alliance in Canada has not changed our investment strategies or policy asset allocation ranges as a result of market activity. We have added some additional GIC options for plan members so that members have more additional ‘guaranteed’ fixed income term options. (Members have invested only 2% of total defined contribution (DC) assets in GIC products, so these products are not selected often.) In 2008, our Investment Advisory Committee (with board approval and after prior member notification) took action to ‘tweak’ the asset allocation of default plan members. Default members were notified that this action may be taken annually. Plan members choose to default into four funds that provide an overall Canadian Balanced Fund asset allocation.

So we are taking a DB approach to DC default members’ pension plans to manage their asset allocation of fixed income, Canadian equities and global equities within SIPG ranges. Of course, we don’t take this action for plan members who choose to invest differently from the default option. Our committee reviews asset allocation quarterly and will decide whether or not to take 2009 asset allocation action as a part of our Q3 review process for DC default members.

Bélanger: We haven’t made any changes to our investment strategies and asset allocation. We have stuck to our rebalancing policy, so we have increased our equity exposure in the fall/winter 2008/09 and rebalanced down since the spring of 2009.

Latest news

OPTrust returns 9.6% in 2024, remains fully funded

The OPSEU Pension Trust is reporting a return of 9.6 per cent in 2024, according to its latest year-end report. It found, as at Dec....

  • By: Staff
  • March 14, 2025 March 13, 2025
  • 15:00

Coverage of the 2025 Chronic Disease at Work conference

For the past 10 years, Benefits Canada’s Chronic Disease at Work conference has examined the current trends in chronic disease in Canada and what they mean for...

Growing share of plan members with chronic diseases experiencing multiple co-morbidities

Chronic disease rates are rising and cases are becoming more complex, with a higher share of plan members experiencing multiple co-morbidities. This growing trend necessitates...

Addressing the root cause of chronic diseases by treating obesity

Obesity is one of the most misunderstood diseases, with stigma and judgement contributing to the misconceptions, said Lisa Schaffer, executive director at Obesity Canada, during...

Today's top stories

Survey finds 85% of employers believe workplace friendships support increased employee retention

Friendship among employees can yield several benefits for employers, including supporting their attraction and retention strategies, according to a new survey by the Harris Poll...

  • By: Staff
  • March 14, 2025 March 12, 2025
  • 15:00

Why you should hire an onsite counsellor

The cumulative cost of mental illness is estimated to reach $2.5 trillion by 2041, according to a report by the Centre for Addiction and Mental...

HOOPP reports 9.7% return in 2024, net assets increase to $123BN

The Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan is reporting a 9.7 per cent return as at Dec. 31, 2024, with net assets increasing to $123 billion,...

  • By: Staff
  • March 13, 2025 March 12, 2025
  • 11:00

Fewer than 5% of global employers completely prohibiting remote working: survey

While more than two-thirds of global companies say they’ve implemented a formal policy requiring employees to be in the office for a minimum number of...

  • By: Staff
  • March 13, 2025 March 12, 2025
  • 15:00