The findings can perhaps help investors understand how to better protect their portfolios against politically-driven market swings and how the price of options shifts in different political situations. Although the authors haven’t yet tested their model in the current political environment (the paper first appeared in 2015) it offers some helpful context for plan sponsors seeking to bolster their portfolio against shocks by using options.
The team first reasserts the fact that political uncertainty is priced into the option market – and finds that weak economic conditions make those options more expensive, hence exacerbating the effects of political uncertainty. And it’s not just country-specific. Weak economic conditions mean that uncertainty and its effects on the market are more likely to spill across borders and into other countries.
That might seem like stating the obvious given today’s situation, however it’s a helpful reminder for investors thinking about protecting their portfolios with options. Bottom line – if you think options are valuable now, just wait until economic growth starts to slide.
The authors also conclude by admitting much more work needs to be done to understand the link between politics and market movements – and while this early work on market reactions to summits and elections is a good starting point, there’s a long road ahead before we fully understand how markets move in relation to politics.
This could prove to be a large and untapped field…