Activists protest OAS changes

Do you agree the age of eligibility for OAS should be raised from 65 to 67? Take our poll.

Yesterday afternoon, labour activists, seniors, and retirees descended on 21 Tory MP offices across Ontario to protest proposed cuts to Old Age Security benefits. Harper’s comments in Davos, Switzerland last month have inflamed a new movement of workers and pensioners—one that calls itself a movement of “Blue-Grey Power.”

“Prime Minister Harper’s hypocrisy is stunning. He chose to announce his plans to cut Old Age Security in front of the one percenters in Davos when he knows full well that if he were to retire in 2015, he would have a platinum-plated, taxpayer-funded pension of $223,517 a year,” said Sid Ryan, president of the Ontario Federation of Labour, from the sit-in taking place in Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s Whitby constituency office.

The protestors are demanding that Conservative MPs abandon plans to push back the OAS eligibility age from 65 to 67, or make any reductions to benefits. Instead, they are calling for the Harper government to introduce modest increases to CPP contributions.

“By cutting Old Age Security, Stephen Harper is attacking the most vulnerable Canadians. The majority of seniors are living on $25,000 a year or less after paying a lifetime of taxes,” said Orville Thacker, president of the Ontario Federation of Union Retirees.

A recent report by Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page set off a heated debated in the House of Commons earlier this week. In the report, Page said Canada’s OAS is not only sustainable, but that Ottawa can afford to increase benefits for seniors.

Flaherty said today that any changes to the OAS will likely come in 2020 or beyond. “This is for 2020, 2025 so that people who are middle age and younger today … can be assured that they will have these social programs properly funded, fiscally responsible, that they’ll be there for them in the future,” he said. “The timing of what we do will involve more than one budget and we will announce some steps forward, but we certainly need to plan ahead and this is not for tomorrow morning.”