This is still leading-edge stuff, with pioneers investigating, postulating, fact-finding, measuring and testing. It will take a long time before these ideas become mainstream, at which stage everyone will know which variants have survived and we may witness an emergence of multiple practitioners. Meanwhile, we see lists used by pioneers that vary from six basic drivers across asset classes to 17 drivers for equities alone, with little overlap among the lists. Some postulated drivers are grounded in the economy, such as inflation, real interest rates, economic growth, political risk and so on. Others are market-based, such as equity value/growth, cap size, dividend yield and volatility. Additionally, others are centered on momentum, the carry trade, merger/arbitrage – the list is far from exhaustive.
What we do know is that, given the overlap across asset classes and return drivers, asset allocation is now an inadequate means for studying and controlling total fund risk. An integrated total fund perspective on exposure to return drivers is now necessary.
Investors and investment committees now have to understand how service providers identify return drivers, how they translate concepts into portfolios, how they estimate whether particular drivers are currently priced in or not – and how to convince their boards that increasing leverage in some areas is a relevant tool for risk reduction.
Don Ezra is global director emeritus, Investment Strategy, Russell Investments